The Financial Times MBA Ranking: A Deep Dive
The Financial Times (FT) MBA ranking is one of the most influential and closely watched assessments of business schools worldwide. Published annually, it evaluates MBA programs based on a comprehensive set of criteria, influencing prospective students, employers, and the schools themselves.
Key Ranking Criteria
The FT ranking employs a weighted methodology across several categories, broadly divided into alumni career progress, school diversity, and research quality. Here’s a breakdown of some prominent factors:
- Salary Today (20%): Reflects the average salary earned by alumni three years after graduation. This is a key indicator of the MBA’s value proposition.
- Salary Increase (20%): Measures the increase in salary from pre-MBA to three years post-MBA, highlighting the return on investment.
- Career Progress (10%): Assesses the level of seniority and the size of the company where alumni are employed.
- Aims Achieved (5%): Based on alumni surveys regarding the extent to which their goals were fulfilled by obtaining the MBA.
- Faculty Diversity (5% total): measured by the proportion of international faculty and female faculty, each contributing to 2.5%
- International Mobility (8%): Measures the degree to which alumni changed their country of employment.
- Research Rank (10%): Assesses the quality of research publications in leading academic journals.
It’s important to note that the weighting of these criteria can fluctuate slightly year to year, so it’s always recommended to consult the FT’s official methodology document.
Impact and Criticism
The FT ranking significantly impacts a business school’s reputation, application volume, and funding opportunities. A higher ranking can attract top faculty and students, boosting the school’s overall prestige. For prospective students, the ranking provides a benchmark for comparing different MBA programs and making informed decisions. Employers often use the ranking to identify potential recruits from highly regarded institutions.
However, the FT ranking isn’t without its critics. Some argue that the emphasis on salary can disproportionately favor certain industries and locations, potentially disadvantaging schools with a focus on social impact or entrepreneurship. The reliance on alumni surveys can also introduce bias, as alumni may be more likely to respond positively if they have had a favorable experience. Furthermore, the ranking primarily focuses on quantitative metrics, potentially overlooking qualitative aspects such as teaching quality and program culture.
Interpreting the Ranking
While the FT ranking provides a valuable overview of MBA programs, it should be viewed as one piece of the puzzle. Prospective students should consider their individual goals, career aspirations, and learning preferences when choosing a program. Factors such as program specialization, location, and networking opportunities may be just as important as the ranking itself.
749×499 master finance worldwide ft rankings from escp.eu 
752×500 advanced master finance worldwide ft rankings from www.escp.eu 
500×436 financial times master finance ranking masters finance hq from msfhq.com 
650×400 ft global rankings iim bangalore topped mba college india from www.pagalguy.com 
1080×1080 top ft masters finance rankings french from www.philippines.campusfrance.org 
1536×500 fts top mba finance ranking sees school global top from www.alliancembs.manchester.ac.uk 
831×640 european executive education swamps annual rankings from www.forbes.com 
1920×1080 financial times master ranking tbs business school from www.tbs-education.com