American Apparel, once a symbol of made-in-the-USA basics and controversial advertising, experienced a dramatic financial downfall marked by debt, declining sales, and ultimately, bankruptcy. Understanding its financial trajectory offers valuable lessons about brand management, debt burden, and the complexities of modern retail. The company’s early success was fueled by its vertically integrated manufacturing model, strong brand identity (albeit often criticized), and commitment to ethical labor practices within the United States. This model, while admirable, proved to be incredibly expensive. Maintaining domestic production facilities, paying higher wages, and providing employee benefits all contributed to significant operating costs. Dov Charney, the company’s founder and CEO, implemented an aggressive growth strategy financed largely through debt. This reliance on leverage proved unsustainable when sales began to falter. Charney’s controversial behavior and accusations of misconduct also damaged the brand’s reputation, further impacting consumer perception and sales. As sales slowed, American Apparel struggled to service its burgeoning debt. The company accumulated millions in losses, forcing it to explore various restructuring options. It attempted cost-cutting measures, including store closures and workforce reductions, but these efforts proved insufficient to stem the tide. In 2015, facing mounting debt and ongoing financial struggles, American Apparel filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The bankruptcy process aimed to restructure the company’s finances and reduce its debt burden. However, the restructuring plan ultimately failed to revive the struggling retailer. In 2016, American Apparel filed for bankruptcy a second time. This time, the company sought a buyer for its assets. Gildan Activewear, a Canadian apparel manufacturer, acquired the American Apparel brand and certain assets, including intellectual property, but not its manufacturing facilities or retail stores. The acquisition by Gildan marked the end of an era for American Apparel as a vertically integrated manufacturer in the United States. Gildan relaunched the brand, shifting production overseas to reduce costs and improve profitability. The new American Apparel focuses primarily on wholesale and online sales. The financial failure of American Apparel provides several key takeaways. First, excessive reliance on debt can be detrimental, especially in a volatile retail environment. Second, a strong brand identity is crucial, but it can be easily damaged by controversy and reputational issues. Finally, while ethical labor practices are admirable, they must be balanced with financial sustainability to ensure long-term viability. The American Apparel story serves as a cautionary tale about the challenges of balancing ethical considerations with the harsh realities of modern retail finance.